|
Nutritional Support in Critical Care
Nutritional support has become a routine part of the care
of the critically-ill patients and leads to better clinical outcome, lower infection
rate and reduced hospital stay
"The
critically ill patient often utilise fat better than carbohydrate as an
energy source, so it may be advantageous to provide more than 30 per cent
fat, which is the content in our normal diet"
- Dr Vikram Mahajan
Senior Consultant
Indraprastha Apollo Hospital
New Delhi
|
As many as 40 per cent of adult patients are seriously malnourished
when admitted to a hospital. Acute illness further exacerbates patients' poor
nutritional status by increasing their metabolic rate and impairing the allocation
of nutritional substrates. The consequences of malnutrition especially in the
critically ill leads to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital
stay, impaired wound healing, defective muscle function (reduced respiratory
and cardiac function), immuno-suppression with increased risk of infection.
Nutritional support plays a vital role in preventing the above and has become
a routine part of the care of the critically ill patients and leads to better
clinical outcome, lower infection rate and reduced hospital stay.
The role of nutrition in the critically ill continues to
develop. Here, we shall review the following issues:
- Optimal route.
- Quantity.
- Micronutrient components and Immuno-nutrition.
Route of Administration
All
methods of delivering artificial nutrition carry risks and these must be minimised
and the potential benefits considered.
There is certainly consensus that enteral nutrition should be considered before
the parenteral route. Enteral route is more physiological and has lots of advantages
over parenteral route. Functional and structural integrity of the gastrointestinal
mucosa is maintained. It is relatively non-invasive, cheap and may reduce the
risk of infectious complications, associated with parenteral nutrition. So,
it is the preferred route and should be started when nutrient intake is inadequate
for one to two days.
However, enteral nutrition may be associated with some problems like risk of
micro-aspiration in ICU, risk of dangerous misplacement or displacement of the
feeding tube. High gastric aspirates may be present in patients on opioids,
sepsis and with electrolyte imbalance. It may frequently result in under-nutrition
unless protocols are used to avoid to ready cessation of feeds. Acceptance of
gastric residual volumes of 200-250 ml and the early use of prokinetics are
key elements of such protocols. Head-up tilt of 30-450 should be used whenever
possible to facilitate enteral nutrition and to prevent microaspiration. Feeding
tubes like the standard Ryle's tube of 14 F or 16 F are not preferred since
it not only causes more discomfort but also enhances gastro oesophageal reflux
and increased chances of aspiration. Fine bore size 8F or 10F flexible tubes
with stylet is to be used.
Although the enteral route should be considered before the parenteral route.
However, parenteral nutrition may not be as harmful as often assumed to be.
Certain patients, particularly in the emergency surgical setting, cannot be
fed by the enteral route because it is neither possible nor safe. There is also
a substantial group of non-surgical patients who cannot tolerate the required
quantity in the first few days and have persistently high gastric residual volumes
together with significant pre-existing nutritional deficits. These patients
should be fed parenterally to provide adequate nutrition and not be deprived
of essential nutrients in order to avoid parenteral nutrition.
When using the parenteral route, one must be aware of all the possible complications
and try to minimise them. Infection and bacteremia is the most dreaded complication
and should be prevented by strict aseptic precautions in not only inserting
but also handling the central venous catheter line at all times. Also, the line
should be dedicated to feeding only and not used for other drug/ fluid administration
or monitoring the CVP. Other complications are ones related to catheter insertion,
thrombosis, venous perforation, air embolism and line displacement. Parenteral
nutrition is also associated with metabolic complications like hyperglycaemia,
hypoglycaemia, electrolyte imbalance, hypertriglyceridemia, metabolic acidosis
and trace element deficiencies. Frequent monitoring of the blood chemistry will
prevent the metabolic complications. The use of insulin to maintain tight glycaemic
control is now common place in critical care and essential when parenteral nutrition
is administered. Underfeeding with lipid-free, hypo-caloric solutions does not
prevent hyperglycaemia or reduce infective complications.
Quantity of Support
The overall aim of nutritional support is to provide patients with their macro-nutrients
(carbohydrates, fat and proteins) and micro-nutrients (trace elements, vitamins).
The estimation of a patient's requirements is an essential component of nutrition
support, ensuring that the patient's nutritional needs are met without significant
over or underfeeding. In everyday hospital practice, several different equations
are used, often without an adequate understanding of their origins and limitations.
This can lead to significant variation in energy provision, which could have
serious implications for patient care. As a first step of working, start with
estimating total fluid requirements. As a rule of thumb this will be between
30 and 40 ml/kg/day or 1 ml water per calorie for an adult, but this will need
to be supplemented should total losses be excessive.
Also, it should be remembered that requirements will need to be modified according
to individual patient needs and specific disease processes.
Carbohydrate, Fat & Proteins
Thirty to 70 per cent of the total calories can be supplied as carbohydrate
in the form of glucose but fructose and sorbitol are also used. 20 to 50 per
cent is to be given as fat. Each gram of fat can yield 9.1 kcal. The critically
ill patient often utilise fat better than carbohydrate as an energy source,
so it may be advantageous to provide more than 30 per cent fat which is the
content in our normal diet. Essential fatty acids like linoleic acid are also
an important content of the fat whose deficiency leads to cardiac dysfunction
and increased susceptibility to infection. The protein intake should match the
rate of catabolism. The protein requirement during normal metabolism is 0.8-1.0
gm/kg and in hypermetabolism is 1.2-1.6 gm/kg. The goal is to maintain a positive
balance of four to six gms by providing enough non-protein nitrogen.
Vitamins and trace elements are an essential component of a patient's daily
requirement and are necessary for normal metabolism, cellular function and several
enzyme systems.
It is certainly better to underfeed rather than attempt to match a calculated
energy requirement, particularly when this is high in sepsis or trauma. This
has been shown in a study (by Krishnan JA, Parce PB, Martinez A, Diette GB,
Brower RG. Caloric intake in medical ICU patients: consistency of care with
guidelines and relationship to clinical outcomes. Chest 2003; 124: 297-305),
when patients who received between 33 per cent and 65 per cent of calculated
requirements (according to American College of Chest Physician guidelines) had
better outcomes in terms of mortality and duration of ventilation compared with
those receiving greater than 65 per cent. Failure to deliver at least 25 per
cent of calculated requirements is associated with significant increases in
infection and mortality.
- Early start of nutritional support in ICU
patients leads to better clinical outcome, lowers infection rate and
reduces hospital stay.
- Enteral nutrition is to be preferred to
parenteral whenever access to a working small intestine is available.
- Relative underfeeding is associated with
improved mortality no matter which route is used and it is particularly
important when parenteral nutrition is being established
- The benefits of immunonutrition has been
demonstrated particularly when combination of substances are used.
- Glutamine has accumulated the most evidence
for improved outcomes in the critically ill, arginine may actually cause
harm.
- There is some evidence that administration
of antioxidants like selenium might reduce ICU mortality.
|
Immuno-nutrition
Immuno-nutrition is a relatively new concept in critical care feeding to which
there is a growing body of evidence reporting benefits. Glutamine, arginine,
fish oils and ribonucleotides, as well as a host of anti-oxidants including
Vitamins C and E, selenium, and other trace elements have been the focus of
immuno-nutrient research. There are a number of important considerations in
evaluating their use.
Glutamine: The rationale for glutamine replacement
during critical illness is clear as it is an important fuel for enterocytes
and lymphocytes and has a role in nucleotide synthesis. This helps to maintain
gut mucosal integrity and cellular immune function. As a consequence, translocation
of enteric bacteria is reduced and infective complications less frequent. Glutamine
is also a precursor for glutathione which has important anti-oxidant actions.
Overall, its benefit gas been reviewed in a meta-analysis by Heyland et al.
It has shown to be beneficial in parenteral nutrition in general ICU patients
and possibly beneficial in elective surgical patients and in enteral nutrition
in burns/ trauma patients.
Arginine: Arginine supplementation has been shown
to be beneficial in cancer patients but may actually be harmful in the critically
ill. It may lead to haemodynamic instability, immunosuppression, cytotoxicity
and organ dysfunction. Most studies have shown significant increase in mortality
in patients with sepsis. Therefore, arginine supplementation is not recommended
in septic ICU patients.
Fish oils: The use of omega-3 fatty acids results
in release of mediators which reduce platelet aggregation and leukocyte chemotaxis.
This may be helpful in patients with acute lung injury on enteral feeds containing
omega-3 fatty acids and reduce mortality rates. This has been clinically shown
in a study but still the evidence base is limited.
Anti-oxidants: The body has a number of endogenous
anti-oxidant defence mechanisms like superoxide, dismutase, catalase, glutathione
peroxidise and reductase (with zinc and selenium as co-factors) as well as vitamins
E and C. Many patients in the ICU will already be deficient in these due to
chronic health, smoking and poor diet. These patients are then subjected to
increased consumption of scavengers and losses of anti-oxidants and decreased
intake of vitamins and minerals when free radical production is at its highest.
In many studies the use of anti-oxidants has shown to be of benefit in the general
ICU patients and the evidence seems more dramatic for selenium.
Prebiotics/Probiotics/Synbiotics: The intestine normally
contains millions of microbes whose optimal function depends on the supply of
fermentable fibres and gastrointestinal secretions delivered to the colonic
bacteria. In ICU, the combination of antibiotics, reduced intake of normal dietary
substrates and the un-physiological use of tube feeding regimes lead to sub-optimal
gastrointestinal function and altered gut flora. We need to provide new flora
(probiotics) and also food for the flora (prebiotics). A combination of probiotic
micro-organisms and pre-biotic carbohydrates is called synbiotic food. New studies
have shown that addition of prebiotics/ probiotics/ synbiotics to enteral nutrition
may not have effect on infectious complications, but may be associated with
significant reduction in ICU mortality and may also reduce diarrhoea.
vikram007mahajan@hotmail.com
|